CA7: An “unavoidable glance through the open door is not a search.”

Two Posner opinions of note involving the Fourth Amendment decided a day apart:

In Balthazar v. City of Chicago, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 22744 (7th Cir. November 8, 2013), police had a search warrant and were in an apartment building, and the officer with the battering ram went to the wrong door. Another officer yelled “wrong door,” but he couldn’t check the swing, and broke the door. They went to the right door and entered. The city promptly paid to fix the door, but the officers didn’t otherwise “search.” Plaintiff sued under § 1983. At trial, it was apparent she was lying, so they had to go with alternate theory and lost. “ If  you know you’re in the wrong place—a place you’re not authorized to search or want to search—the “unavoidable glance through the open door is not a search.”.*

Morrow v. May, 735 F.3d 639 (7th Cir. 2013)*, is a false arrest § 1983 case. It’s great, entertaining writing (appellant’s counsel wouldn’t think so) and you wonder why there was an appeal, but it adds nothing to the body of Fourth Amendment law.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.