CA2: Defendant’s arranging a meet corroborated CI’s story

The CI provided detailed information in person about the defendant’s drug dealing activities, and it was corroborated by defendant arranging a meeting to acquire drugs. United States v. Cardona, 545 Fed. Appx. 76 (2d Cir. 2013).*

Petitioner’s guilty plea foreclosed his post-conviction search and seizure claim. Barrett v. United States, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168760 (S.D. Ohio November 27, 2013).*

Defendant can’t pursue a 2255 claim about his search claim where he litigated it pretrial. United States v. Emmanuel, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168273 (M.D. Pa. November 26, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.