CA8: Working meth lab was exigent circumstance

Officers had both exigent circumstances and consent for an entry. Neighbors complained of a strong chemical smell coming from defendant’s house, and officers determined it was obviously from a meth lab. When they knocked, the fan turned off, and the people inside wouldn’t respond for a while. United States v. Reed, 545 Fed. Appx. 579 (8th Cir. 2013).

The warrant for search of one defendant’s house was valid. Excluding the evidence challenged under Franks, there was still probable cause for the warrant. United States v. Gray, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23120 (11th Cir. November 15, 2013).*

Defendant’s motion to suppress merely argued he was a passenger in the back seat of a car that was not even alleged to be unlawfully stopped, so his motion to suppress is denied for lack of standing. United States v. Allie, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163350 (W.D. Pa. November 18, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.