OH11: Drug deal heard on wire and defendant retrieving drugs from house is PC for house

The testifying officer heard the drug deal go down on a wire and watched the defendant go in his house and get the drugs and return for the sale. That’s PC. Any falsity in the information or testimony was mere oversight and not deliberate. State v. Hudson, 2013-Ohio-4967, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 5167 (11th Dist. November 12, 2013).*

No basis to file a motion to suppress, so no IAC. Moore v. State, 2013 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 969 (November 6, 2013).*

Defendant’s girlfriend consented to an entry into the property, and then defendant consented to a patdown inside. State v. Stephens, 2013-Ohio-5008, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 5206 (5th Dist. November 7, 2013).*

Officers had a search warrant for defendant’s vehicle with plenty of probable cause. Defendant fled from the vehicle, however, effectively abandoning it, and that’s all the court needs to say. United States v. Smith, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161722 (D. Minn. October 31, 2013).*

Officer’s testimony he saw the gun in plain view was credited by the district court and the evidence clearly supports that conclusion. United States v. Cunningham, 546 Fed. Appx. 203 (4th Cir. 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.