SCOTUS argument in Brendlin v. California today

Back on January 19th, SCOTUS granted cert in Brendlin v. California, posted here and docket here.

The question presented is: “Whether a passenger in a vehicle subject to a traffic stop is thereby “detained” for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, thus allowing the passenger to contest the legality of the traffic stop.”

The petitioner’s brief is here and the State of California’s brief is here.

From my previous post: “The California Supreme Court decision is People v. Brendlin, 38 Cal. 4th 1107, 45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50, 136 P.3d 845 (June 29, 2006). Lexis Overview: ‘Because a deputy effected a traffic stop without any indication that defendant, the passenger, was the subject of his investigation or show of authority, defendant was not seized for Fourth Amendment purposes when the driver submitted to the deputy’s authority and stopped the vehicle; thus, defendant was not entitled to suppress evidence of drugs.’ [The free link to the California Supreme Court opinion is now dead.]”

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.