N.D.Ind.: Health care fraud search warrant for home office permitted search of bedroom closet

Defendant is a psychologist suspected of health care fraud, and Indiana law required him to keep seven years of records. Officers knew that he also had a home office, so it was reasonable for the search warrant to include his home for records. The period was 2005 to present for patient records, so it was not overbroad for that. The warrant didn’t include the bedroom or closets in the places to be searched, but officers looked there. United States v. Jones, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91886 (S.D. Ind. July 1, 2013):

It is well settled law that the Government can search all of the property including closets, containers, and any other closed compartments found on the property as long as the area or item to be searched is large enough to contain the contraband they are looking for. Electronic storage devices, which are normally small enough to fit in the palm of one’s hand, seven years of treatment records, and safes which could possibly be used to store documents or electronic storage devices, could have been located anywhere on the property in addition to the office, so it was reasonable for the agents to search the bedroom closet and entire residence. Additionally, Agent Guider’s information did not limit the search; she merely provided examples in order to establish a basis for probable cause to search the entire residence.

Records are not “contraband.” So, if the warrant asks for electronic data, the entire house and every drawer and pocket of clothing is subject to search? Isn’t that tantamount to a general warrant? There are no limits.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.