OK: Driver of rental vehicle not on contract still shown to have standing

Driver of a rented van who was not on the rental contract was still found to have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the van. State v. Bass, 2013 OK CR 7, 300 P.3d 1193 (2013):

[*P9] Given these authorities and the analysis therein, this Court declines to find that Bass, who was in sole possession of the van he was driving, did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of the van. Although Bass was not listed on the rental contract for the van, he told Officer Hyde that the person listed on the contract gave him permission to drive the van; and the record contains no evidence to the contrary. Furthermore, the rental agency confirmed that the van had not been reported stolen. Under these circumstances, we find that Bass had a right to challenge the search of the van, which led to the discovery of the marijuana that Bass was then charged with possessing.

This is the better view. Some early cases wanted to find no standing whatsoever when the driver was given permission. If the vehicle isn’t shown as stolen by the rental company, standing should be a given. Otherwise, the person who gave him the car may have to be found to testify, and that can be really hard at times. Besides, if standing is found, that doesn’t mean that the defendant wins the motion to suppress. There still has to be a finding on reasonable suspicion for the stop and probable cause or consent for the search.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.