D.S.D.: Hour wait for drug dog in rural SD was reasonable

Once reasonable suspicion arose in a motorist assist, the officer called for drug dog, but the closest was an hour away. The detention was still reasonable under all the circumstances despite that delay. United States v. Salgado, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48696 (D. S.D. April 1, 2013),* affd 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14633 (8th Cir. July 31, 2014).*

An undercover officer saw defendant remove a gun from his waistband and put it in the trunk of the car. The officer had a uniformed officer make a stop, which was valid based on an observed traffic offense, despite other subjective motives. The driver consented to a search of the car, and the record supports that finding. United States v. Gonzales, 520 Fed. Appx. 720 (10th Cir. 2013).*

Officers invited into the home can conduct a protective sweep, too. It was quick and to the point, and officers retreated as soon as it was complete. United States v. Gastelum-Castro, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49058 (W.D. Mo. February 25, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.