U.Chi.Underg.L.Rev.: “A Technologically Sensitive Amendment: A Historical Analysis of the Fourth Amendment and the Development of Technology”

U.Chi.Underg.L.Rev.: A Technologically Sensitive Amendment: A Historical Analysis of the Fourth Amendment and the Development of Technology by Aglaia Ovtchinnikova:

The original Constitution, drafted in 1787, did not contain a Bill of Rights. The Fourth Amendment contains just fifty-four words, and, while on the surface they seem reasonably clear, one must note that it does not forbid all searches; nor does it forbid all searches without a warrant granted by a court. The Amendment undoubtedly forbids “unreasonable searches and seizures,” but in practical application, we rely so heavily on the facts of each case that any sense of grounding in neutrality or standard procedure is heavily shaken. With each case that is brought forth, the courts grapple with the drafters’ intention, while balancing the needs of the people in the modern era. The introduction of various technologies that the drafters could have never even imagined begs the question: what types of searches enabled by these novel devices should be permitted as constitutional, and which others should be deemed so intrusive that they violate the protections offered by the Fourth Amendment?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.