OH7: 36 minute stall for drug dog during traffic stop was unreasonable

Defendant was stopped for suspicion of DUI drugs, and it normally took ten minutes to write a citation. There was no suggestion that being under the influence meant possession. Here the officer took 36 minutes as he stalled around for the drug dog to get there, and that was unreasonable because it became a criminal search. “The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to remove incentive from the police to violate the Fourth Amendment.” [sure not citing Herring]. State v. Elliott, 2012 Ohio 3350, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 2944 (7th Dist. July 11, 2012).

State supported the legality of its DUI checkpoint. City of Ashtabula v. Presciano, 2012 Ohio 3418, 2012 Ohio App. LEXIS 3020 (11th Dist. July 30, 2012).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.