CA: Two SWs for ballots alleging no crime

In Bonta v. Bianco, S295901 (Cal. Sep. 24, 2026), the California Supreme Court dealt with two search warrants to seize ballots from a prior election. The AG of California ordered the return of the ballots because the warrant application specified no crime under investigation.

“The Warrant specifies the goal is ‘to conduct a search of the residence that was used by the offenders on the day of the homicide, to recover any and all firearms, black hooded sweatshirt, black jacket, black sweatpants with reflective patch on left leg, white/gray sneakers, all latent print and DNA evidence, all cell phones, computers, tablets, and other digital evidence including video DVR systems and other video recording devices in order to identify communications between conspirators and their movements the day of the murder.’ Ogden Street Warrant, …. The Ogden Street Warrant therefore described with sufficient particularity the place to be searched and the items to be seized.” United States v. Stallworth, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215728 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 23, 2026).*

This entry was posted in General warrant, Particularity, Warrant papers. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.