E.D.N.Y.: No standing in husband’s cell phone searched in Syria; no REP in NCEM database

“Defendant Halima Salman is charged with receiving military type training from a foreign terrorist organization in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2339D.” The government maintains a database of who is involved in military activities overseas: NMEC. Defendant’s husband’s cell phone was seized in Syria and the contents uploaded; pictures, social media posts, etc. There’s no challenge to that seizure. Searching the database did not violate the Fourth Amendment. There was no standing in his phone, and there’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in that database. United States v. Salman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218278 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 5, 2025).

Officer’s seeing a hand rolled cigarette during a traffic stop for window tint was reasonable suspicion. State v. Perry, 2025-Ohio-4945 (5th Dist. Oct. 28, 2025).*

There is no doubt that there was probable cause for defendant’s detention, handcuffing, and frisk. Farden v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213214 (D.N.M. Oct. 29, 2025).*

CoA on defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim of failing to properly litigate a Franks motion. The government supplemented the record below to clarify ambiguities. Ward v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 28591 (6th Cir. Oct. 31, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.