AZ: A traffic offense could be used to stop defendant to question him about a fatal accident 11 days earlier

Defendant committed a traffic offense and was stopped. Officers had reasonable suspicion he left the scene of a fatal accident 11 days earlier, and officers wanted to talk to him about that. The stop was not pretextual because there was a factual basis for it. State v. Foster, 2024 Ariz. App. LEXIS 142 (Nov. 7, 2024).

“Based on the recited facts, we agree that a reasonable juror could conclude that Hughes was not suspected of having committed a serious crime, posed no immediate threat to the officers, was not attempting to flee from arrest, and was outnumbered. This is adequate to state a Fourth Amendment violation.” Hughes v. Herbster, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 28279 (3d Cir. Nov. 7, 2024).*

In this child pornography case, the police breached the door of defendant’s home because they feared erasure of all the data by resetting the cell phone. When they had the phone in hand, they told defendant to give the passcode, which he did. That is not even discussed on appeal. Malone v. State, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 7860 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg Nov. 7, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Excessive force. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.