S.D.Ill.: Code enforcement officer’s entry to construction site to stop work was not a “search”

A code enforcement officer’s entry onto plaintiff’s construction site to stop work in violation of the city code was not a Fourth Amendment search. And it was otherwise reasonable. Kindle v. Eisert, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198527 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 31, 2024).

“The district court must balance a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights against the government’s ‘substantial’ interest in a ‘proper and effective supervision.’ … The interest in proper and effective supervision necessitates suspicionless searches here.” United States v. Dority, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27645 (2d Cir. Oct. 31, 2024).*

The FBI SWAT team came to defendant’s house to serve a search warrant with an armored vehicle parked outside. He came out backwards as instructed in shorts and a t-shirt. He was told he was free to go. “A reasonable innocent person, told he is free to leave by an FBI Agent, would believe it on the totality of these facts.” United States v. Lightner, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197806 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 31, 2024).*

2255 petitioner didn’t plead anything to show that search warrant here was obtained in bad faith or that anything could be suppressed. Molina v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197952 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Custody, Probation / Parole search, Search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.