CA11: CI’s veracity wasn’t really specific enough, but it was still enough for the GFE to apply

“Second, the affidavit establishes the informant’s veracity. … But the statements about the informant’s reliability, while lacking specificity, are at the very least ‘indicia of probable cause.’ Whether or not probable cause existed, this warrant (though inartfully drafted) presents enough indicia of probable cause for an objectively reasonable officer to rely on it in good faith. See Leon, 468 U.S. at 923. And because the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies, the evidence of the search was properly admitted by the district court.” United States v. Whitlow, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26272 (11th Cir. Oct. 17, 2024).*

A stop or encounter that was reasonable under the community caretaking function can turn into reasonable suspicion. People v. McAndrew, 2024 IL App (1st) 230881, 2024 Ill. App. LEXIS 2361 (Oct. 17, 2024).*

Impoundment of plaintiff’s RV for blocking other parking spaces was reasonable under the community caretaking function under city ordinance that sought to address this. Potter v. City of Lacey, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 26253 (9th Cir. Oct. 17, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.