WI: “Protective frisk” of defendant’s car justified by furtive movement and history of drugs and violence

The “protective frisk” of defendant’s car was justified. When he was stopped, he was nervous and the officer observed furtive movements. A computer check revealed defendant’s arrest record, which included a recent drug delivery arrest and arrests for armed robbery, false imprisonment and murder. State v. Buchanan, 2011 WI 49, 334 Wis. 2d 379, 799 N.W.2d 775 (2011).*

The officer had probable cause to arrest defendant for interference with an officer, and that led to discovery of DWI. Vasco v. State, 2011 WY 100, 253 P.3d 515 (2011).*

The search of defendant’s car for heroin was based on probable cause. United States v. Feliciano-Melendez, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69511 (D. Del. June 29, 2011).*

After a controlled delivery by USPS Postal Inspectors of cocaine from Panama, a search warrant was executed on the premises and a vehicle associated with it. The search of papers in the car did not exceed the officer’s authority under the warrant. United States v. Ashley, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69441 (E.D. Va. June 27, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.