MI: Assault of officer during allegedly illegal arrest is not suppressable

Even if defendant’s arrest was illegal, the exclusionary rule does not bar testimony of defendant assaulting the officer during the arrest. People v. Corr, 287 Mich. App. 499, 788 N.W.2d 860 (2010), ordered published March 9, 2010.*

Defendant’s “false friend” argument [my words] that he did not consent to an undercover officer’s entry failed. He let in the officer for a drug deal, and that was consent. State v. Allison, 326 S.W.3d 81 (Mo. App. 2010).*

Defendant’s co-tenant consented to a search of the premises, and defendant was there and did not object. Woolverton v. State, 324 S.W.3d 794 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 2010).*

In a Garrison-type situation where officers arrived with a search warrant for one apartment and discovered two, they withdrew to determine what do to. Before the question of getting another search warrant was resolved, they got valid consent for the apartment at issue. United States v. Pineda-Buenaventura, 622 F.3d 761 (7th Cir. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.