OH7: No REP in police interrogation room; conversation with wife after statement to police recorded

Defendant gave a statement to the police and then he was left alone in the interrogation room to talk to his wife for 40 minutes. Police recorded the conversation. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the room, and, even if marital privacy was violated, it’s admission was harmless in light of other proof. State v. Kinney, 2019-Ohio-2704, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 2838 (7th Dist. July 2, 2019).

Defendant fails to show that the search warrant for his child pornography was issued without probable cause or was stale. He argues drug case staleness, and that’s a false analogy. United States v. Gordy, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110654 (M.D. Tenn. July 2, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.