N.D.Ind.: CI was adequately corroborated and predictive info proved correct

The CI had been working with the drug officers for four months, and his significant information had been significantly corroborated. He also accurately predicted that $400,000 would be packaged and shipped by defendant. That was probable cause. United States v. Norton, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69177 (N.D. Ind. April 28, 2016).*

Defendant was stopped because the paper tag was in the back window. On closer inspection, it was out of date, and that justified continuing the stop. Clay v. State, 2016 WY 55, 2016 Wyo. LEXIS 59 (May 27, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.