D.Nev.: Touching the fog line when a police car is in one’s blind spot isn’t a traffic offense; stop unreasonable

Defendant touched the fog line and wasn’t driving erratically. As he explained on the video during the stop, he was concerned that there was a police car staying in his blind spot and he was trying to stay away from it. “Even if Trooper Lee was mistaken in good faith about whether Wendfeldt’s driving violated NRS 484B.223(1), this does not transform the unlawful traffic stop into a lawful one.” Defendant’s alleged obvious nervousness wasn’t apparent on the video. When questioned by the officer he said: “I have no reason for standing here, and I don’t know what you’re doing.” The prolonged seizure was unreasonable. It was not “de minimus.” United States v. Wendfeldt, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157764 (D. Nev. November 7, 2014).

Defendant’s curious movement of his pant leg in his apartment was furtive enough for a frisk. Officers had recovered a gun in the same apartment two days earlier. United States v. Loftin, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157426 (D. Nev. March 13, 2014).*

Defendants’ stop away from the border was based on reasonable suspicion, but the officers had no probable cause or consent to search the car. United States v. Gonzales, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157754 (D. Ariz. November 7, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.