CA9: Cal. probation search could be suspicionless, so lack of corroboration of CI didn’t matter

In a probation search, the government must first have probable cause to believe the home is the defendant’s, a fact not in dispute in this case. This search was based on a CI saying that defendant was involved in a homicide, but the CI’s track record and information was clearly lacking. A shotgun was found at defendant’s house. A California probation search, however, can be suspicionless, so the gun was not suppressed after all. United States v. King, 672 F.3d 1133 (9th Cir. 2012), amended August 27, 2013 with a dissenting opinion on denial of rehearing en banc.

Where defendant’s father signed a consent to search form, his mother’s refusal to sign because she disagreed with the search was not binding on the police. Brunetti v. Comm’r of Corr., 134 Conn. App. 160, 37 A.3d 811 (2012).*

A “road closed” sign is a traffic control device, and disobeying it justified a stop. State v. Morrissey, 19 Neb. App. 590, 2012 Neb. App. LEXIS 52 (March 13, 2012).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.