CA11: Possession of firearm in high crime area not RS

Possession of a firearm in one’s pocket in an open carry state is not reasonable suspicion. Being in a high crime area adds nothing to that. United States v. Joseph, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 27723 (11th Cir. Sep. 9, 2026).

Here, the CI’s information about defendant’s travel was corroborated by Flock camera readings. United States v. Robertson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203090 (N.D. Iowa Sep. 9, 2026).*

The investigating officer tied hard to ascertain defendant’s address connecting him to a place to be searched, and he could rely on a social media post listing it as home, even though public databases put him elsewhere (but that was old information). There was no false information for Franks, and the totality showed a reasonable inference of location. United States v. Staples, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203036 (D. Nev. July 21, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.