E.D.Mo.: Seizure of def’s Apple watch was valid as a search incident because it could be used to erase iPhone

Seizure of defendant’s Apple watch was valid incident to arrest because officers had fear he could erase his iPhone with it. The traffic stop might have been pretextual, but it doesn’t matter because defendant had an arrest warrant on a federal indictment pending. As to a Franks challenge, defendant fails in his offer of proof. United States v. Avery, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177942 (E.D. Mo. July 2, 2026).

Defendant was stopped for driving his rental car too long in the passing lane. The car smelled of burnt marijuana. On the totality, including defendant’s priors for drugs, the officer had reasonable suspicion to continue the stop because he suspected defendant was carrying drugs between Harrisburg and Lancaster. Commonwealth v. Gould, 2026 Pa. Super. LEXIS 420 (Aug. 10, 2026).*

Defendant’s stop for a traffic offense was reasonable because there was a factual basis, no matter the officer’s motivation. Then reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Billips, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176422 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.