CA6: SW in drug case led to finding CSAM, SW was still particular

Defendant was a suspect in a drug investigation, and they got search warrants for his place and cell phones, not knowing even how many there were or what they looked like. The warrants were with probable cause. The search for drug trafficking information led to discovery of CSAM. The warrant was still particular because suspects could use false file names to hide things. United States v. Metzger, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23553 (6th Cir. Aug. 4, 2026).

There was probable cause for defendant’s arrest for being involved in a fight (“scrum”) outside a DC nightclub. The officer’s testimony differing somewhat from the bodycam, but that’s not determinative because it was a mess and confusing. Even the bodycam wasn’t conclusive. United States v. Ray, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174743 (D.D.C. July 31, 2026).*

The government’s 270 day delay in seeking a search warrant to search defendant’s packages wasn’t unreasonable enough to require suppression. He admittedly had a reduced privacy interest in them. United States v. Bennett, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 23661 (9th Cir. Aug. 6, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Particularity, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.