N.D.Cal.: Tribe’s suit over overbroad SW can proceed

The Tribe stated a Fourth Amendment claim against the county officials for executing an allegedly overbroad search warrant aimed at the Tribe’s cannabis operations on the reservation. The county alleged also that earthmoving work on the reservation was detrimental to the county. Round Valley Indian Tribes v. Kendall, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134356 (N.D. Cal. June 16, 2026)*:

The court finds that Plaintiffs have stated enough facts to sufficiently allege that the search warrants violated the Fourth Amendment. In addition to their cannabis-specific elements, the warrants also authorize the investigation and seizure of property related to statutory violations that may not otherwise have been authorized in Indian country. For example, two search warrants used in the searches of Individual Plaintiffs’ property allow for seizure of property described as “heavy equipment, earthwork and land alteration activities” and “deleterious material placed in or near state waterways,” and they authorize searches by officers from other government agencies with expertise in building codes, environmental health, and water rights to investigate state business licensing and water code violations, among others. …. Plaintiffs have alleged that state and local officials do not have jurisdiction to enforce these types of local land use and state environmental provisions on the reservation but that Defendants nevertheless wanted to enforce them on tribal land as part of a multi-county coordinated effort, and Defendants have not argued otherwise for either proposition. Search warrants that exceed the scope of probable cause and search warrants that exceed the issuing magistrate’s jurisdiction violate the Fourth Amendment. …

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Overbreadth. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.