D.Kan.: SW application with expired notary stamp doesn’t violate 4A

A search warrant application that was notarized with an expired notary stamp was not a Fourth Amendment violation. McAlister v. Kansas, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55139 (D. Kan. Mar. 17, 2026).

2255 petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim for not moving to suppress is foreclosed by the Fourth Circuit’s addressing the merits of the search issue on appeal by plain error review as law of the case. Ojedokun v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54770 (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2026).

Defendant had a meritorious motion to suppress his cell phone which all happened after Riley, but it wasn’t pursued. New trial ordered with evidence suppressed. Commonwealth v. Hunter, 2026 PA Super 48 (Mar. 17, 2026).*

The search warrant here for child pornography was particular and the time limit didn’t really matter for staleness. In any event, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Johnson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54830 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Neutral and detached magistrate. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.