CA11: QI in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial

Qualified immunity in excessive force cases can be raised for the first time mid-trial without it being waived. Edwards v. Grubbs, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 7500 (11th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026).

“However, Groth must show not only that the officers used force unreasonably, but also that ‘every reasonable officer would have realized that [the challenged] conduct violated the Fourth Amendment under our then-existing precedent.’ … The burden therefore rests on the plaintiff to identify published, controlling authority with closely comparable facts that would bind a panel of this court and place the constitutional question beyond debate at the time of the incident.” Davis v. Dean, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49953 (D. Md. Mar. 11, 2026).*

Sex acts between an officer and a previous detainee were not Fourth Amendment seizures. Other courts in this circuit agree, and they’re followed. A case from the Seventh Circuit would disagree, but it’s not followed. Resendiz v. Christian, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51932 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 12, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.