S.D.Fla.: No REP in overheard cell phone call in public

Defendant has no expectation of privacy in a cell phone call in public on the phone’s speaker which here happened to get recorded. United States v. Curtis, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122858 (S.D. Fla. October 24, 2011).*

Pro se plaintiff did not state a claim that seizure of $2,900 from his wallet during booking inventory violated the Fourth Amendment or due process by not depositing it into his inmate account in the jail. Stork v. McKinley, 444 Fed. Appx. 920 (7th Cir. 2011).*

Multiple cell phones, extra gas cans, overwhelming odor of air fresheners, and no drivers license was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Banks, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123082 (M.D. Pa. October 25, 2011).*

The search of defendant’s car that produced cash was admittedly by consent. United States v. Two Hundred & Eight Thousand Sixty Dollars, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123127 (E.D. Mo. October 25, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.