IL: Unzipping defendant’s pants looking for drugs was valid as a SI

Defendant was arrested for driving on a suspended license, and the officer suspected he was in possession of drugs. In a patdown, the officer went over his crotch area and felt something that probably was drugs. The officer unzipped defendant’s pants and found a baggie of drugs sticking through a hole in his underwear. The search incident was valid on the patdown revealing probable drugs. People v. Carter, 2011 IL App (3d) 90238, 354 Ill. Dec. 260, 957 N.E.2d 576 (2011).

Defendant was put on probation for a sex offense in Texas and transferred probation to Ohio, and his probation included a search provision. His probation officer went by the house twice and found the mail box full of mail and no sign of the probationer. So, the PO searched the house finding bullets and that defendant had absconded. The search was legal. State v. Gaona, 2011 Ohio 5214, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 4290 (5th Dist. October 7, 2011).*

Result of a P2P search of defendant’s computer could be used in a search warrant, and the search warrant was not stale because there was indication that the child pornography was on the computer for quite sometime. United States v. Suing, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116349 (D. Neb. September 30, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.