OH5: One judge’s refusal to grant a search warrant does not bar the police asking for consent

A Municipal Judge’s denial of a search warrant is not res judicata barring the police for asking for consent. Res judicata is a final judgment on the merits. The basis for denial of the warrant is not revealed by the record. “Moreover, Appellant presents no law that indicates that the denial of a search warrant is a final appealable order which would lead to the invocation of the doctrine of res judicata in subsequent proceedings. [¶] There is simply no indication as to why the search warrant was denied or what parties were involved in the request for the warrant or indication that an actual hearing took place.” Moreover, his consent was an independent act. State v. Mackenzie, 2011 Ohio 4966, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 4091 (5th Dist. September 28, 2011).

Defendant was driving a car with permission of the owner, and he succeeded in showing that the stop lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause, so the search is suppressed. The sole basis for the stop was that the color of the car did not match the DMV registration. United States v. Uribe, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112001 (S.D. Ind. September 28, 2011).*

Defendant’s contention that the officer stalled the stop to get more time for the drug dog to arrive was rejected because of the overall time limit involved from beginning to end: 13½ minutes. Dickey v. State, 2011 WY 136, 261 P.3d 739 (Wyo. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.