OR: Passenger was free to go on side of road when she consented to a search of her purse

Defendant passenger in a car was not in custody or subjected to a show of force when she consented to a search of her purse. The driver had been arrested, and the passenger was going to be let go. The officer suggested she call for a ride, but she couldn’t raise friends. He asked if she could walk and she said she could. Then the officer asked for consent and got it finding drugs in her purse. She was free to go, but consented. State v. Dudley, 245 Ore. App. 301, 263 P.3d 1054 (2011), on remand from State v. Dudley, 349 Ore. 663, 249 P.3d 1281 (2011).

Defendant’s stop was valid, and a drug dog was a minute away. The delay in getting the dog there was not unreasonable. Defendant was an unauthorized driver of the rental car, and he lacked standing to challenge the search. United States v. Jefferson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100742 (S.D. Fla. September 8, 2011), R&R 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 143674 (S.D. Fla. December 19, 2010).

Pretrial detainee’s excessive force claim is governed by the Fourth Amendment. Bryson v. Okla. County ex rel. Okla. County Det. Ctr., 2011 OK CIV APP 98, 261 P.3d 627 (2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.