E.D.Tenn.: Late discovery of a bodycam video supports reopening def’s Franks challenge

A late disclosed bodycam video support a Franks challenge, and defendant gets to reopen his suppression hearing. United States v. Price, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88965 (E.D. Tenn. May 9, 2025).

A time gap in when a confederate checked into their hotel and the key card was issued doesn’t establish sufficient falsity for a Franks challenge here. United States v. Triplett, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88926 (S.D. Ohio May 9, 2025).*

“So even if everything Combs challenged as a misstatement was taken out and everything Combs says was inappropriately omitted was added in, there was still enough for probable cause of the federal offenses identified in the affidavits.” And, even if the warrants were defective as to particularity, they still were executed in good faith. United States v. Combs, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89165 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2025).*

Defendant returned through JFK after a family vacation in Egypt. His cell phone was searched without probable cause or a warrant, something required by a prior case, decided two years after his search. United States v. Sultanov, 742 F. Supp. 3d 258 (E.D.N.Y. 2024). The Second Circuit hasn’t ruled yet. The child pornography found is suppressed for lack of a warrant. United States v. Robinson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89035 (E.D.N.Y. May 9, 2025).* [No Davis good faith?]

This entry was posted in Body cameras, Border search, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.