W.D.Mo.: Judge actually participating in seizure denied absolute immunity

A state judge is denied absolute immunity for allegedly participating in a seizure in the courthouse rather than just ordering it. Rockett ex rel. His Minor Children v. Eighmy, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205918 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 13, 2024).

A jailer did not commit an unlawful search by Googling an inmate’s criminal history. Conley-Reifer v. Butler Cty. Prison, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205127 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 12, 2024).*

Under the state statute on probation and parole searches, defendant’s claim another person’s unreasonable search [never suggested to present a standing problem] was defaulted as not preserved for review below. Harding v. State, 2024 Ark. App. 560 (Nov. 13, 2024).* (Preserved or not, it would have lost. Not even close. But, the Arkansas courts will hold you defaulted an issue rather than just say you couldn’t win it even if you did it right, thereby implying that maybe you could have if you did it right.)

This entry was posted in Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.