KY: SI of car for no DL on driver violated Gant

Defendant was stopped for a traffic violation, and he did not have his driver’s license on him. He was asked for consent which he refused. The officer said he was getting a drug dog but didn’t. Finally, he conducted a field sobriety test, and defendant passed. Then he arrested the defendant for no DL. A search incident after defendant was locked in the police car was invalid under Gant. Turner v. Commonwealth, 2011 Ky. App. LEXIS 138 (August 12, 2011). [Caution: If the vehicle would be towed, could the state argue inventory as an alternative?]

Just because defendant had one brake light out did not mean that his vehicle did not comply with the state vehicle code. The taillights otherwise worked, and the statute only referred to “stop lamp.” Therefore, the stop was invalid. State v. Heien, 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 1750 (August 16, 2011).*

A university police officer was fired after making a complaint that other officers had violated the Fourth Amendment in conducting a search on campus. The ALJ upheld the firing. On appeal, the court held that the officer was a whistle blower, and his motive for complaining was pretty much irrelevant. Lawson v. Bowie State Univ., 26 A.3d 866, 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1252, 161 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P61,177 (Md. 2011).* [Which only goes to show that police departments usually protect their cops; one complains about another and he’s gone as a troublemaker.]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.