CA3: Locked exterior door to a common area in a multi-unit apartment complex does not enhance REP

Locked exterior door to a common area in a multi-unit apartment building does not create a separate or better expectation of privacy. Defendant arrested there had no objectively reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Correa, 653 F.3d 187 (3d Cir. 2011):

A Task Force searching for an escaped fugitive entered the common areas of a multi-unit apartment building. The building had a locked exterior door, and an inspector entered through a partially opened side window. Once inside, the Task Force apprehended Defendant-Appellant Frank Correa in a common-use stairwell, and, after a struggle, Correa informed the inspector he had a firearm. The inspector retrieved the firearm from Correa’s pocket. Correa moved to suppress the firearm and the statement he made to the inspector as fruit of an illegal seizure. The District Court denied the motion. We previously held in United States v. Acosta, 965 F.2d 1248, 1252 (3d Cir. 1992), that a resident of an unlocked multi-unit apartment building lacks an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in the building’s common areas. We determine today that the presence of a locked exterior door does not alter that expectation. Accordingly, Correa’s suppression motion was properly denied. We will affirm.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.