LA1: Common knowledge CP is seldom, if ever, disposed of

“Moreover, there is nothing revelatory about the notion that a collector of child pornography will maintain his collection for years. This idea is arguably part of the field of common knowledge. Courts over the years have consistently found that collectors of child pornography do not quickly dispose of their cache and, in fact, rarely if ever dispose of such material. As such, even a substantial delay between the distribution of child pornography and the issuance of a search warrant does not render the underlying information stale.” State v. Friday, 73 So. 3d 913 (La. App. 1st Cir. 2011).

The record supports the finding of consent for the officer to enter, and then a roach was seen in plain view. Further consent developed from that. State v. Stephens, 71 So. 3d 462 (La. App. 2d Cir. 2011).*

“We would find the trial court erred in granting Defendant’s motion to suppress the blood sample seized from Defendant without his consent and without a warrant after he was arrested for driving while intoxicated. However, in the light of the fact that no Missouri case has yet addressed the import of the removal of the words ‘none shall be given’ from Section 577.041, which we believe involves a significant departure from current case law as represented by the Smith case, and the general interest and importance of the issues involved, we transfer the case to the Missouri Supreme Court, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 83.02.” State v. McNeely, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 858 (E June 21, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.