NY: No RS where two men talked car-to-car and then moved, and one leaned in other car; nothing seen passed

There was no reasonable suspicion to stop and detain defendant for what the officer thought could have been a hand-to-hand drug transaction where he saw nothing exchanged. Defendant stopped along side another car facing in different directions, and they talked to each other through open windows. Then they moved to another spot and defendant leaned into the other car. Again, nothing was seen being passed. People v. Messano, 2024 NY Slip Op 00097, 2024 N.Y. LEXIS 2 (Jan. 11, 2024).

“In short, each affidavit provided specific and compelling evidence to support that Hess issued various prescriptions for illegitimate purposes and outside the usual course of medical practice between 2014 and 2019. As pointed out in the Government’s opposition briefing [ECF No 32], Hess attacks isolated portions of the affidavits, focusing on information which was not included within the affidavits. However, the Court must apply a ‘totality-of-the-circumstances’ test when evaluating probable cause and cannot use a piecemeal approach.” Other things challenged were not material. United States v. Hess, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4693 (N.D. W.Va. Jan. 9, 2024).*

Defendant wasn’t seized until an officer grabbed his arm. By then, however, there was reasonable suspicion of crime justifying a Terry stop. United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4747 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 9, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.