CA5: Plaintiff stated claim against TX DFPS for Fourth Amendment violation

At this stage of the pleadings, plaintiff stated a claim for relief for DFPS violating their clearly established Fourth Amendment rights in the entry of defendants’ home without alleged consent, exigent circumstances, or special needs. Thomas v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective Servs., 427 Fed. Appx. 309 (5th Cir. 2011) (unpublished):

We first inquire whether any of the alleged violations, as stated, would represent a violation of Appellants’ Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. In this Circuit, it is “well established … that the Fourth Amendment regulates social workers’ civil investigations.” Gates v. Tex. Dep’t of Protective & Regulatory Servs., 537 F.3d 404, 420 (5th Cir. 2008) (citing Roe, 299 F.3d at 401). We have further noted that “[w]arrantless searches of a person’s home are presumptively unreasonable unless the person consents, or unless probable cause and exigent circumstances justify the search.” Id. (quoting United States v. Gomez-Moreno, 479 F.3d 350, 354 (5th Cir. 2007)) (alteration in Gates). Therefore, based on the allegations in the complaint, Collins violated Appellants’ constitutional rights unless we find that consent, exigent circumstances, or special needs existed.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.