NE: Reliability of Google Translate app for use to get consent to search not preserved below

Consent to search granted by a non-English speaking suspect via Google Translate app was not properly preserved for appeal as to the accuracy of the translation. “While Hernandez’ counsel objected to the admission of the evidence obtained from the search of the vehicle on Fourth Amendment grounds, no objections were made at trial during any of the testimony concerning the Google Translate translations. Without any objection made during this testimony—particularly an objection that attacked the translation’s foundational reliability—the issue was not preserved for appeal. Accordingly, this argument fails.” State v. Cisneros, 32 Neb. App. 354 (Oct. 31, 2023).

It was objectively reasonable for the officer to stop defendant here for a wide turn despite there might be a subjective motive for it. United States v. Thomas, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194540 (D.S.D. Oct. 27, 2023).*

Defendant’s claim defense counsel was ineffective for not investigating a motion to suppress was waived by his guilty plea. Even so, he doesn’t even show how he would have prevailed if it had been pursued. Dzuy Tran v. State, 2023 Miss. App. LEXIS 433 (Oct. 31, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness, Voluntariness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.