E.D.Mich.: SW for entire iCloud account limited by crime under investigation was particular

The fact the CI related information that was publicly known doesn’t support the story. “Although the Court concludes that the Apple/iCloud warrant was not supported by probable cause, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.” The case was a pay to play scheme of bribery, and the affidavit shows nexus to defendant’s iPhone and iCloud account. The phone was used in furtherance of the scheme. Searching the entire iCloud account was sufficiently limited by specifying the crime that limited it. There is a time limitation because the crime didn’t start until 2015. United States v. Sollars, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121792 (E.D. Mich. July 14, 2023).*

Defendant’s location and actions driving in a rural area near Nogales gave reasonable suspicion for an immigration stop. United States v. Taylor, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120967 (D. Ariz. June 21, 2023).*

There was no motion to suppress, but there were no grounds to suppress. People v. Youngblood, 2023 Mich. App. LEXIS 4938 (July 13, 2023);* People v. Martin, 2023 Mich. App. LEXIS 4933 (July 13, 2023).*

Just because some information in the application for the warrant was in footnotes, the court won’t assume the issuing magistrate didn’t read them. United States v. Oladipo, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121268 (D. Mass. July 14, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.