E.D.Cal.: Inconsistent statements on ownership was enough to let out the dog, 6 minutes into the stop

Defendant’s stop for speeding was valid, and inconsistent statements about ownership of the car justified a six minute detention for a drug dog, which alerted and was probable cause for a search of the car. United States v. Guerrero, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27668 (E.D. Cal. March 17, 2011).*

Police called defendant’s PO with information allegedly received from defendant’s daughter that he had an AK-47 in the house, but it was represented as anonymous information. The PO and his supervisor decided to wait to see if the police obtained more information. Finally, they went to conduct the search. The court finds that it was without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Dono, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27446 (E.D. Pa. March 17, 2011).*

Detailed information from an identified caller that defendant was wearing a military uniform and carrying a gun and playing with the bullets when the caller knew that the defendant was not in the military was sufficient reasonable suspicion for a stop. United States v. Powell, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27222 (N.D. W.Va. March 16, 2011), R&R Powell, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27182 (N.D. W.Va. February 11, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.