NH: Enclosed porch is part of the house, not just part of curtilage

Defendant’s enclosed porch, which also was a living space, was part of the house and not just curtilage. Police entry was unreasonable. The fact there was another solid door to the main house isn’t determinative. There was no implied right to enter to knock on the inside door. [Inside doors are solid, too.] State v. Beauchemin, 161 N.H. 654, 20 A.3d 936 (2011), with an unenclosed porch is distinguished. State v. Davis, 2021 N.H. LEXIS 162 (Oct. 28, 2021).

“In making this objection, defendant Harden either miscalculates the weight of the information available to law enforcement officers or misunderstands the probable cause standard. As Judge Roberts noted, the facts here are indeed complicated. (Doc. 92, at 4). The events of the evening of November 4, 2020, involved a number of moving parts and required law enforcement officers to piece together often fleeting and seemingly disparate facts and observations. Even so, after considering the quantum of information available to law enforcement officers and the relatively low standard that constitutes probable cause, the Court agrees that there was sufficient evidence to establish probable cause that evidence of the armed robbery would be located within defendant Harden’s house.” United States v. Harden, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208240 (N.D.Iowa Oct. 28, 2021),* adopting R&R 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 209365 (N.D.Iowa Oct. 1, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Curtilage, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.