PA: Search of cell phone well after seizure under SW outside time limits was still timely

The search warrant for defendant’s phone was timely executed as to the seizure of the phone but the search occurred outside the time to execute it. Suppression is not the proper remedy. Further, the court interprets “execute” as “served.” Federal cases are in accord. Commonwealth v. Bowens, 2021 PA Super 210, 2021 Pa. Super. LEXIS 641 (Oct. 18, 2021).

Even without the challenged assertions in the search warrant affidavit, there is probable cause. United States v. Bimbow, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200441 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2021).*

Plaintiff’s constitutional claims, including the Fourth Amendment, were insubstantial and manufactured in an attempt to create federal subject matter jurisdiction in this 421 page complaint. This was a state contract claim over an insurance policy. O’Neal v. Allstate Indem. Ins. Co., 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 31265 (11th Cir. Oct. 18, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.