NY (Kings Co.): SW for cell phone failed to show nexus to the crime

“As such, the People failed to establish a nexus, supported by probable cause, that the cell phone recovered was the cell phone used at the time they allege the defendant committed the charged crimes and therefore cannot satisfy the required element of probable cause to believe evidence of the crime will be found in the location to be searched.” People v. Chen, 2021 NY Slip Op 50808(U), 2021 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4569 (Kings Co. Aug. 23, 2021) (unpublished).

Defendant met his Franks burden to make a substantial preliminary showing to get a hearing. The offending paragraph was critical to the finding of probable cause. At the hearing, however, “Burgos did not demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that Det. Arroyo knowingly and intentionally made a false statement.” “With overwhelming evidence to support probable cause, Det. Arroyo lacked any reason to have intentionally and knowingly misstated facts in the Complaint.” “The remaining question is whether Det. Arroyo’s ‘sloppy drafting’ rises to the level of ‘reckless disregard for the truth.’ The Court finds that it does not.” United States v. Burgos, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161836 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021).

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Nexus. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.