CA8: Presenting def with DNA SW after he lawyers up wasn’t attempt to reopen interrogation

Presenting defendant with a search warrant for DNA swabs during an interrogation after he lawyered up was a statement of fact and not an attempt to get him to talk again. Thus, Miranda not violated. United States v. Zephier, 2021 U.S. App. LEXIS 5584 (8th Cir. Feb. 25, 2021).

The plaintiff estate’s claim survives a motion to dismiss that on the disputed facts, the park ranger’s shooting of decedent was unreasonable under clearly established law, therefore no qualified immunity. Bolger v. United States, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34819 (W.D. Ark. Feb. 23, 2021).*

This entry was posted in Custody, DNA, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.