CA5: Oil rig worker in Gulf was properly subjected to computer border search

An oil rig worker returning from a rig in the Gulf of Mexico crossed the border for purposes of a border search. The point of origin of the trip is irrelevant; the fact of a border crossing is what makes it reasonable. The oil rig is a federal enclave, but defendant traveled through international waters to get back to shore. Child pornography was found on his computer during a border search. United States v. Pickett, 598 F.3d 231 (5th Cir. 2010) (this per curiam opinion is not on the court’s website).

The record supports the conclusion that officers smelled burning marijuana when the defendant’s car was stopped, and that led to a search. United States v. Hunter, 373 Fed. Appx. 973 (11th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the consent search. On the merits, a motion to suppress would fail on alleged coercion. Therefore, no IAC. United States v. Henderson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38147 (M.D. Pa. April 19, 2010).*

Defendant admitted he was lawfully stopped and ordered out of the car. He admitted that he had unlawful prescription drugs in the car. That justified a search. United States v. Schlatter, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38258 (N.D. Ind. April 19, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.