D.Utah: Typo in entering vehicle license that yielded matching vehicle was still objectively reasonable

Factual mistake on typing in the vehicle license number (“N” v. “M” when vehicle was driving by at night) that yielded a matching vehicle was an objectively reasonable stop. United States v. Christensen, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37330 (D. Utah April 15, 2010):

Applying these principles, the court concludes that Officer Lavin’s factual mistake 4 was objectively reasonable given the totality of the circumstances in this case. As set forth above, Officer Lavin was attempting to observe a known drug house, a vehicle parked in front of the house, and the vehicle’s license plate, all while driving at a rate of fifteen to twenty miles per hour, late at night. It was under these conditions that Officer Lavin mistakenly typed an “N” instead of an “M” while entering the license plate query. Then, after receiving the computer results, Officer Lavin erroneously concluded that the computer-generated vehicle description was consistent with the white truck parked in front of the residence.

While a more detailed and lengthy review of the vehicle description would have yielded additional information that might have alerted Officer Lavin to the fact that the insurance information was for a different vehicle, the description nonetheless included the critical and obvious terms “1997,” “white,” “truck” — terms that were entirely consistent with the vehicle he observed. Given the conditions under which Officer Lavin was working, the relatively rapid pace in which the situation unfolded, and the remarkably similar license plate numbers and vehicle descriptions, the court finds that Officer Lavin’s mistake was objectively reasonable.

The District Court properly denied a COA on this § 2255 petition because his plain view argument was not even fairly debatable. United States v. Winston, 373 Fed. Appx. 826 (10th Cir. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.