NY1: Def showed that multifamily use of premises was permitted, not that it was such at time of search

The warrant was sufficiently particular because the premises was apparently occupied by a single family. The city authorized it to be a multifamily dwelling, but there’s nothing at the suppression hearing that shows that it was used that way at the time of the search. People v. Duval, 2019 NY Slip Op 08542, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8548 (1st Dept. Nov. 26, 2019).

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was raised in previous habeas petitions, so it’s barred in a successor petition. In re Williams, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 35336 (11th Cir. Nov. 25, 2019).*

Appellant has moved a second time for a COA from his denial of habeas relief in the district court. It’s denied by law of the case doctrine. United States v. Akel, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 35330 (11th Cir. Nov. 25, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Particularity. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.