D.P.R.: Calling an out of time motion to suppress a motion in limine doesn’t get around the time limits

Calling an out of time motion to suppress a motion in limine doesn’t get around the time limits. It was 14 months too late, and trial starts tomorrow. United States v. Fígaro-Benjamín, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141655 (D. P.R. Aug. 19, 2019).

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was defaulted before trial, and it can’t be raised on post-conviction. Tam Sing v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140170 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2019).*

Who signed an arrest warrant is not ground for recusal. United States v. Fourstar, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141270 (D. Mont. Aug. 21, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of pleading. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.