NY2: Jail call to codefendant from Rikers was admissible

Defendant was in Rikers and called his codefendant. The calls were admissible and were not the product of an unreasonable search because he was warned of the recording. People v. Boyd, 2019 NY Slip Op 06219, 2019 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6198 (2d Dept. Aug. 21, 2019).

Defendant procedurally defaulted his GPS tracking claim by abandoning his appeal. And, it doesn’t matter because nothing from it was used at the trial. Barnes v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140749 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 20, 2019).*

Defendant’s 2255 Fourth Amendment claim was defaulted in the district court and doesn’t rely on an ineffective assistance claim. Bankston v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141482 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 21, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Prison and jail searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.